The petitioner sought to withdraw the present writ petition along with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court allowed the withdrawal subject to the liberty granted.
Withdrawal of W.P. No.25336 of 2014 allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.25336 of 2014 Date of decision: 03.03.2015.
Kamlesh Devi
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this
petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
03.03.2015 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
NEETU RANI 2015.03.03 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Kamlesh Devi
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
