Jaspal Singh Vs Director Rural Devlopment and Panchayat Department and Ors.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.2267 of 2015. Date of Decision: February 11, 2015

Jaspal Singh

.....Petitioner

versus

Director, Rural Development and Panchayats Department, Punjab and others .....Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

¶8

Present:Mr.Ish Puneet Singh,Advocate, for the petitioner Ms.Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Amandeep Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Gram Panchayat.

¶9

-.-

¶10

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶12

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶13

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶14

The petitioner impugns the order dated 14.08.2014 passed by the Director, Rural Development and Panchayat exercising the powers of Commissioner under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961.

¶15

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involves in this case stands answered vide order dated 21.01.2015 passed in CWP No.26456 of 2014 (Amolak Singh vesus Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department and others).

¶16

Consequently and for the reasons assigned in the aforesaid order dated 21.01.2015, the instant writ petition is allowed in the same terms and the order passed by the Collector as well as the Appellate Authority are set-aside and

¶17

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.12 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP No.2267 of 2015 [2]

¶19

the matter is remitted to the Collector, Amritsar for afresh adjudication.

¶20

Parties are directed to appear before the Collector, Amritsar, on 09.03.2015.

¶21

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE

¶22

February 11, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE