Reetu Saroya and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/18677/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This judgment is a procedural endorsement referencing a detailed order passed in CWP No. 18676 of 2003 on the same date. The operative decision and legal reasoning are contained in the judgment of the sister petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
¶2
CWP No.18677 of 2003 Date of Decision.05.01.2015
¶3
Reetu Saroya and others
¶4
.......Petitioners
¶5
Versus
¶6
State of Punjab and others
¶7
......Respondents
¶8
Present: Mr. Aayush Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
¶9
Ms. Vandana Malhotra, Addl. A.G, Punjab.
¶10
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
¶11
- Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No
¶12
- To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Reetu Saroya and others
- respondent
State of Punjab and others
Coram
AI extract
K. KANNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/18677/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court