The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against evicting disputed premises, ruling the petition premature as the eviction proceedings under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act are pending and no order served.
We dismiss the writ petition being totally premature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.18619 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 04, 2015
Swaran Singh
.....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.Baldev Singh Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
The instant writ petition virtually seeks ad-interim prohibitory injunction against the Municipal authorities though such an undertaking has already been given on behalf of the respondents before the Civil Court that the disputed premises shall not be got vacated except in due course of law. It is undeniable that eviction petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 is still pending consideration and no eviction order has been passed so far. Notice for eviction has also not been served. In these circumstances, we dismiss the writ petition being totally premature.
Ordered accordingly.
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.04 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Swaran Singh
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
