Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner to approach State Government for policy benefit parity under the 2013 Policy regarding marriage palace regularization.
Petitioner petition withdrawn. Reference to reporters allowed only if ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17695 of 2015 Date of Decision: August 25, 2015
M/s Gurna Farm House (Marriage Palace), Patiala
.....Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition so as to approach the State Government to extend the benefit of its Policy dated 06.05.2013 to all those Marriage Palaces who applied for regularization under the old Policy dated 16.11.2012 seek parity with those who sought regularization after 06.05.2013.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT]
JUDGE
August 25, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.08.27 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
M/s Gurna Farm House (Marriage Palace), Patiala
State of Punjab
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
