This judgment dismisses the civil writ petition, which stands disposed of by referencing a separate co-extensive judgment rendered on the same date in Civil Writ Petition No.5761 of 2015 concerning similar parties and subject matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 209
Civil Writ Petition No.14097 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 01, 2015
Sahab Singh & others
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Commissioner, Rohtak, Division, Rohtak & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
. . .
PRESENT : - Mr. B.S. Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for Gram Panchayat, village Ichhanpur.
. . .
Jaspal Singh, J
The petition stands dismissed vide separate judgment of even
date rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.5761 of 2015 titled ‘Sahab Singh &
others vs. Learned Collector, Karnal & others’.
(Jaspal Singh) (Surya Kant)
Judge Judge
September 01, 2015
avin
AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.18 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sahab Singh & others vs. Learned Collector, Karnal & othersReferred¶20
Civil Writ Petition No.5761 of 2015
Sahab Singh & others
Commissioner, Rohtak, Division, Rohtak & others
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
