This petition was rendered infructuous on instructions that the petitioner's case had been duly considered by the authorities. The petitioner abandoned the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 12476 of 2015
Date of Decision: 28.10.2015
Baba Pritam Dass Shiksha Samiti, Jewali
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
The National Council for Teachers Education and Another
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sandhawalia.
Present: Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Ashish Rawal, Advocate for respondents.
G.S.Sandhawalia, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and he does not wish to press the same as he has instructions that petitioner's case has been duly considered.
Ordered accordingly.
(G.S.Sandhawalia) Judge
October 28, 2015
“DK”
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2015.10.29 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Baba Pritam Dass Shiksha Samiti, Jewali
The National Council for Teachers Education and Another
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
