This order references an earlier corresponding record and attests to its accuracy. No substantive disposal is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No.2274 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 19, 2015
Rakesh Kumar @ Dhillu
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.S.S.Duhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Satish Saini, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
Mr.N.S.Shekawat, Advocate for the complainant.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For order, see order passed in CRM No.A-41-MA of 2011
titled as Vijay Pal vs. Rakesh Kumar @ Dhillu and another , of even
date.
August 19, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE
VINEET GULATI 2015.09.24 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Rakesh Kumar @ Dhillu
State of Haryana
INDERJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
