Criminal revision challenging dismissal of application under Section 319 CrPC. Court found respondent died on 03.09.2014; petition rendered infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to death of additional accused respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-1523 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.07.2015
Darshan Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Challenge in this criminal revision is to the order dated 28.02.2012 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, whereby application moved under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
for summoning Surjit Singh – respondent No.2 as an additional accused, has been dismissed.
Learned counsel for the State has produced death certificate of respondent No.2 showing that he has died on 03.09.2014.
In view of above, present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
July 02, 2015 R.S.
RAVINDER SINGH 2015.07.03 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Darshan Singh
State of Punjab
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
