Petitioners sought to withdraw their petition in a contempt matter, claiming it became infructuous due to the withdrawal of the underlying complaint. The High Court allowed the withdrawal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.12.15 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-5498-2012 Date of Decision: 15.12.2015
Harminder Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
Rajesh Banyal
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Ms. Gurpreet Jayia, Advocate, for Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate, for Ms. Jyoti Sareen, Advocate, for the respondent.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that she may be permitted to withdraw the petition as it has been rendered infructuous due to withdrawal of the complaint.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
December 15, 2015 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
Harminder Singh
another
Rajesh Banyal
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
