Single benches Nor. Section 482 Interpreted impugned order. Session
Petition pronounced as infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.09.18 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[1]
CRM-M-3846-2015
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-3846-2015 Date of Decision:17.09.2015
Sukhdev Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Ms. Isha Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Sekhon, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. J.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
SABINA, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.28 dated 19.02.2014, under Sections 167, 217, 218, 342, 166-A, 409 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 13(1) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered at Police Station Mehta, District Amritsar and all consequential proceedings arising thereform.
Learned State counsel on instructions from Assistant Sub Inspector Rajinder Pal Singh has submitted
KAPIL 2015.09.18 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-3846-2015 [2]
that petitioner has been found innocent during investigation.
In view of the submissions made by learned State counsel, this petition has been rendered as infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
September 17, 2015 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR should be allowed after petitioner was found innocent.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sukhdev Singh
State of Punjab
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
