Petitioners challenged their summoning in a drug mafia case. The court dismissed the quashing prayer but allowed the petition to permit surrender and maintenance of existing bail bonds under类比 circumstances.
Directed petitioners to surrender and furnish bail bonds; admitted them to bail; continued their appearance obligations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.32350 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 13, 2015
Balshinder Singh and another ....Petitioners
versus Niranjan Singh, Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement.
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.
Present: Mr.C.M.Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Ranjana Shahi, Advocate, for the respondent.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
The petitioners are parents of alleged king-pin of Drug-Mafia Jagdish Singh @ Bhola. They have questioned their summoning by the Special Court, Patiala in a warrant-case made vide order dated 03.08.2015, directing them to appear on 28.08.2015.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
When we were inclined to dismiss the petition so far as the prayer for quashing of summoning order is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the same and confines the relief only qua protection of the petitioners against judicial custody. He submits that on the analogy of the order passed by this Court on 01.10.2015 in CRM-M No.28452 of 2015 (Gurpreet Kaur @ Gurmeet Kaur versus Niranjan Singh, Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India), the petitioners may be permitted to surrender before the Special Judge, Patiala and
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M 32350 of 2015 [2]
furnish their bail bonds to the satisfaction of that Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes that the petitioners shall continue to appear before that Court and cooperate in the ongoing proceedings.
For the detailed reasons already assigned in the order dated 01.10.2015 passed in Gurpreet Kaur's case (supra), we allow this petition in part in the following terms:-
October 13, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gurpreet Kaur @ Gurmeet Kaur versus Niranjan SinghRelied on¶16
CRM-M No.28452 of 2015 (Gurpreet Kaur @ Gurmeet Kaur versus Niranjan Singh, Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India)
Balshinder Singh
Niranjan Singh
Surya Kant
P.B.Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
