High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous since the underlying complaint had already been decided by the Trial Court.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.-M No. 28982 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.9.2015.
Indermohan Bains and another
......Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
None for respondent No. 2.
Mr. Vineet Kaushal, Advocate for Mr. Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No. 3.
SABINA, J.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from Head Constable Avtar Singh, has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the complaint in question has been decided by the Trial Court on 23.1.2012.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 17, 2015 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.18 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Indermohan Bains and another
State of Punjab
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
