COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Quashed FIR No. 61 dated 11.07.2010 registered under Sections 304A, 279 IPC and all consequences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
�����������������������
Date of decision: 21st April, 2015
Amritpal Singh @ Sandeep Singh
� Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
� Respondents
���������������������� ���������������� �����
Present: Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.P.S. Gill, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
����������� ����!����"����#
Report sent through endorsement bearing date 18.02.2014 by learned Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.)4cum4Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ajnala has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Taranpal Singh and the accused Amritpal Singh @ Sandeep Singh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntarilyness, free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.22 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
2
���������������������
Heard.
Keeping in view that being a pure accidental case, the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact that this compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and in bringing about peace and harmony, together with the fact that the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.61 dated 11.07.2010 registered at Police Station Ram Das, Amritsar Rural under Sections 3044A, 279 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
"����������� ����#� ������
�$%&'���!����(� ���
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.22 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the report of the compromiset should be considered valid for quashing the proceedings in a pure accidental case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amritpal Singh @ Sandeep Singh
State of Punjab
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
