The High Court made an interim bail order absolute, placing the petitioners on bail subject to conditions of appearance before the trial court and no unexcused absences.
Interim order dated 15.1.2015 made absolute; petitioners released on bail subject to conditions of appearance and no unexcused absences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr.Misc. M 23 of 2015 Date of decision:- 26.2.2015
Satnarain @ Sattu and anr
Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana
Respondent
Present: Mr. SS Kharb, Advocate. Mr. Arun Kumar Yadav, Addl.A.G. Hry Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
The petitioners having already appeared before the trial court , the petition is allowed and interim order dated 15.1.2015 is hereby made absolute. The petitioners will remain on bail against the bail bonds already furnished, subject to a condition that they will continue to appear before the trial court and will not absent themselves without any sufficient cause.
February 26 , 2015 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
TAPINDER SINGH MANN 2015.02.26 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satnarain @ Sattu and anr
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
