The petitioner's petition was dismissed as infructuous because the ASI submitted a cancellation report to the trial court prior to the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
�����������������������
Date of decision: 9th April, 2015
Harjagdeep Singh and another
� Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
� Respondents
������������� ��������!����������������!�����
Present: Mr. A.S. Khinda, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mehtab S. Khaira, Advocate for respondent No.2.
�����������!����"����#��� $
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Paramjit
Singh submits that even on the second occasion cancellation report has been submitted before the learned trial Court, in the light of which present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
#�����������!����$�
������
�%&'(�)"����*�
���
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.04.10 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Harjagdeep Singh
State of Punjab
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
