The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution due to the complete absence of the petitioner and his counsel.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-18510 of 2014 Date of Decision: January 29, 2015
Rajiv Mehan
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the
petitioner.
Similar was the position on 15.12.2014 and 17.10.2014. It seems that neither the petitioner nor his counsel
is interested in pursuing the present case.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
January 29, 2015 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2015.01.29 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
RAJIV MEHAN
STATE OF PUNJAB
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
