Dismissed
Harbhajan Singh v. Pawan Kumar Kalia
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/15957/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KUMAR MANOJ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2015.11.07 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
CRM-15957 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Order: 05.11.2015
Harbhajan Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Pawan Kumar Kalia
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rubi Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J . (Oral)
Admittedly, the petitioner has not availed the equally
efficacious remedy against the impugned summoning order.
In view of the above, the petitioner is relegated to his alternative remedy against the impugned order at the first instance, however, with a specific liberty to him to approach this Court again by way of similar petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, if necessity arises.
It is further made clear that if the petitioner files revision petition against the impugned summoning order within a period of one month from the receipt of certified copy of this order, the respondent shall not raise the issue of limitation before the learned trial Court.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
November 05, 2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) manoj JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harbhajan Singh
Pawan Kumar Kalia
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court