In a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought quashing of an FIR based on alleged compromise. The Court found no grounds for interference as the State denied the compromise, dismissing the petition.
Petition for quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-15790 of 2014 Date of Decision: 24.02.2015.
Harnek Singh and others
........Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
SABINA, J.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 115 dated 7.11.2011, under Section 447, 427, 379, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Shambhu, District Patiala and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise effected between the parties.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 has denied the factum of compromise between the parties.
No ground for interference by this Court is made out. Dismissed.
(SABINA) JUDGE
February 24, 2015 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2015.02.25 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the FIR and proceedings based on a compromise effort denied by the State's counsel.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Harnek Singh and others
State of Punjab
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
