Referred the petitioners' written statement accepting the Magistrate's judicial satisfaction on a voluntary compromise and allowing a prayer to quash an FIR under the IPC as offences were not serious.
FIR No.81 dated 08.05.2013 registered under Sections 323/324/34 IPC and all consequences arising out thereof are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
�����������������������
Date of decision: 29th July, 2015
Labh Singh and others
� Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
� Respondents
������������� ��������!����������������!�����
Present: Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners.
�����������!����"����#��� $
Report dated 11.06.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sunam (Sangrur) has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Lakhwinder Singh, injured/victim Sewa Singh and the accused persons namely Tulsi Singh and Labh Singh @ Rabbi, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise Ex.CX has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
Heard.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact
that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.29 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
2
����������������������
the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences, in bringing about peace and harmony and in view of the law laid down in %�&'(�!&()�+��!,',-�����.(/'0�'(1�'(�,-2�� ����#�$�����#�2&3&('4$���5 and %6.47&(1-2�!&()�'(1��,-28�+�� !,',-�����.(/'0�'(1�'(�,*-2�������#5$�����#�2&3&('4$�����"� the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.81 dated 08.05.2013 registered at Police Station City Sunam under Sections 323/324/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
#�����������!����$� ������
�.49��:"������ ���
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.29 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer to quash proceedings is allowed in light of the voluntary compromise and nature of offences?
Whether the FIR registered under Sections 323/324/34 IPC should be quashed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Labh Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
