The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition to frame additional pleas at the charge-framing stage. The court dismissed the petition noting it was withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.-M No. 14582 of 2015 Date of Decision: 04.9.2015.
Kirti Kumar Sonak
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Chirag Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he
may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to take up all the pleas available to him at the time of framing of charges.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 04, 2015 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.07 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Kirti Kumar Sonak
State of Punjab
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
