Allowed

Vatan Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Aug 2015CRM-M/12777/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a short order allowing a petition to quash an FIR under Sections 323, 324, and 34 IPC and Section 145 of the Railway Act based on a voluntary compromise recorded by a Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The prayers in the petition were allowed; proceedings by way of FIR No.85 dated 01.09.2013 registered at Police Station GRP Amritsar under Sections 323/324/34 IPC and Section 145 of the Railway Act an

Vatan Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

�� 

¶2

�� Date of decision: 27^th August, 2015

¶3

Vatan Singh and others

¶4

� Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Punjab and another

¶7

� Respondents

¶8

�� 

¶9

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶11

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶12

Present: Mr. Ramandeep, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

¶14

None for respondent No.2.

¶15

�� !��"��#

¶16

Report dated 18.08.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st

¶17

Class, Amritsar has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Charanjit Singh @ Bunty and the accused persons namely Vatan Singh, Harpreet Singh @ Lovely and Karan Singh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

¶18

Heard.

¶19

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.28 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court

¶20

¶21

��

¶22

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in $�%&'� %'()�*�� +&+,��-'.&/�&'0�&'�+),1�� "2#��"�1%3%'&4#��25 and $6-47%'0,1� %'()�&'0��+),18�*�� +&+,��-'.&/�&'0�&'�+),1��"5#��"�1%3%'&4#��!� the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.85 dated 01.09.2013 registered at Police Station GRP Amritsar under Sections 323/324/34 IPC and Section 145 of the Railway Act and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.

¶23

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

¶24

"�� #� ��

¶25

�-(-8+��!�� ��

¶26

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.28 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court

Vatan Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vatan Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Rani Vs Pawan Kumar

Umesh Vs State of Haryana

Udayveer Vs State of Haryana

Shakuntla Rani and Another Vs Prem Singh and Another

Jagmohan Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Gurpreet Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.