Disposed

Sanpreet Kaur and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Apr 2015CRM-M/12341/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking protection against threats by private respondents opposing the petitioners' marriage. The court disposed of the petition without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the petitioners to move a representation to the Superintendent of Police.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to move representation to the Superintendent of Police for protection; further action to be taken by police.

Sanpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs Stat… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M No. 12341 of 2015 Date of Decision: 21.04.2015

¶3

Sanpreet Kaur & another

¶4

......Petitioners

¶5

¶6

State of Haryana & others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

¶9

Present: Mr. Ashok K. Sharma Bhana, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

¶11

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

¶12

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

¶13

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)

¶15

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for issuance of directions to official respondents to protect their lives and liberty from being invaded by private respondents.

¶16

Petitioners claim themselves to be major and have solemnized marriage against the wishes of their parents on 14.04.2015. Factum of marriage has been pleaded with reference to marriage certificate and photographs (Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively). Petitioners feel reasonable apprehension at the hands of private respondents, who were opposing their marriage.

¶17

Precisely, for the grievance made in the present petition, petitioners have already filed a representation before S.H.O. Police Station, Jakhal-respondent No.3 (Annexure P- 5), but no action has

¶18

been taken so far.

¶19

SATYAWAN 2015.04.22 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M No. 12341 of 2015

¶21

-2-

¶22

Notice of motion.

¶23

At this stage, Mr. Pardeep Parkash Chahar, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State. Let three copies of the petition be supplied to him by learned counsel for the petitioners during the course of the day.

¶24

Accordingly, in view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of. The petitioners will move a representation before respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad on any working day putting forth their grievances and on receipt of such representation, respondent No.2 will take appropriate action in accordance with law and if required, necessary protection be provided to them if they are not required in any unlawful activity.

¶25

21.04.2015 ( RAJ MOHAN SINGH ) 'sp' JUDGE

¶26

SATYAWAN 2015.04.22 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Sanpreet Kaur and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanpreet Kaur and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagir Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Gulshan Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Amrik Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Gurpreet Singh Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.

Manohar Lal Vs State of Punjab

Daljit Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.