The present petition has been rendered infructuous and dismissed. The disposal of this matter is without substantive reasoning or legal grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
�����������������������������
Date of decision: 27th July, 2015
Satyawan and another
� Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
� Respondents
����� �����!�"��������#����������������#�����
Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for respondent No.2.
�����������#����$��������"�
In the light of orders of even date passed in CRM3M No.8433 of 2015, whereby the parties have compromised the matter, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and stands dismissed as such.
������������#������
������
�%&'��($������
���
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.27 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Satyawan and another
State of Haryana and another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
