Petitioners granted direction to respondent No. 2 to consider their representation (Annexure P1) under provisions of law.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to consider representation of petitioners as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-12088 of 2015 Date of decision : July 20, 2015
Lal Chand and another
....Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sama, Advocate, for the petitioners
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. J.S.Brar, AAG, Punjab puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. Let a copy of the paper book be supplied to him.
The petition stands disposed off with direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P1) as per the provisions of law.
July 20, 2015 'tiwana'
( Fateh Deep Singh ) Judge
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2015.07.21 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Lal Chand
State of Punjab
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
