The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the parties had amicably settled their dispute, rendering the litigation unnecessary.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.-M No. 11942 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.9.2015.
Sandeep Sandhu and others
......Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Vineet Kaushal, Advocate for Mr. Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. G.K.Mann, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3 has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the parties have amicably settled their dispute.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 17, 2015 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.18 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sandeep Sandhu and others
State of Punjab and others
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
