Petitioner seeking withdrawal of petition as prosecution witnesses reduced from ten to three due to examinations and withdrawals. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1192-2015
Date of Decision: January 27, 2015
Harpal Singh @ Shani
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Aminder SinghAdvocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Jagan Nath of Police Station, Bakhshiwala, District Patiala, states that out of ten prosecution witnesses, five have been examined and two have been given up and, as such, only three prosecution witnesses are left to be examined.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
January 27, 2015 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.01.28 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Harpal Singh @ Shani
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
