Petitioners filed a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC regarding an FIR. The court found the petition rendered infructuous due to the state's prosecution report and disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.08.26 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[1]
CRM-M-10526-2015
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-10526-2015 Date of Decision: 25.08.2015
Jaspreet Singh @ Gora and another ...Petitioners Versus
State of Punjab and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Tajenderpal, Advoate, for Ms. Jigyasa Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Sekhon, AAG, Punjab.
SABINA, J.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.85 dated 16.07.2013, under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short) registered at Police Station Daba, District Ludhiana qua the petitioners and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
Learned State counsel, who is assisted by Assistant Sub Inspector Janak Raj has submitted that cancellation report has been prepared and it will be presented in the Court within one month from today.
In view of the submissions made by learned State
KAPIL 2015.08.26 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-10526-2015 [2]
counsel, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is
disposed of accordingly.
August 25, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE
Jaspreet Singh @ Gora and another
State of Punjab and another
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
