Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the civil revision petition due to typographical errors, with liberty to file a fresh petition impugning the same order. The court ordered accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.7925 of 2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.11.2015
Smt. Sarda Devi and others
..... Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Pushpa and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, as there are certain typographical error, with liberty to file afresh one impugning the same order. Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
27.11.2015 sharmila
SHARMILA 2015.11.28 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. Chandigarh
Smt. Sarda Devi and others
Smt. Pushpa and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
