Single bench dismissal of a revision petition as infructuous due to the decision of the main suit.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR 5125/2013
1
224
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision:09.02.2015.
Sukhdev Singh and another
.............Petitioners
v.
Ajit Singh
.............Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:Ms.Pushipinder Kaur,Advocate for Ms.GK Mann,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Manish Prabhaker,Advocate for respondent.
Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral)
Defendants/petitioners are in revision aggrieved by the order dated 16.7.2013 (P-1) whereby their evidence was closed on the statement of their counsel as also the order dated 25.7.2013 (P-2) whereby their application for recalling DW-1 for cross examination was dismissed by Civil Judge (Junior Division)Amritsar.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners
states that the present revision petition has become infructuous as the main suit itself stands decided.
Dismissed as infructuous.
09.02.2015 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge
RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2015.02.11 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.
Sukhdev Singh and another
Ajit Singh
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
