Smt. Kamlesh Kumari v. Raj Kumar etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
The judgment is a reference to a detailed order passed in C.R. No.1132 of 1998 on the same date, which is not included in this text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.3492 of 1998 Date of Decision.09.04.2015
Kamlesh Kumari and others
.......Petitioners
Versus
Raj Kumari and others
......Respondents
Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
- Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamlesh Kumari and others
- respondent
Raj Kumari and others
Coram
K. Kannan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/3492/1998
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court