Deepak Aggarwal v. Nidhi Bansal
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2015 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES…
of 2015 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No.2680 of 2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.2680 of 2015 Date of Decision.04.05.2015
Deepak Aggarwal
.......Petitioner
Versus
Nidhi Bansal
......Respondent
Present: Mr. Tarun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)
C.R. No.2680 of 2015
-2-
case. The counsel appointed as amicus curiae may be paid ` 5000/- as
fee from the amicus curiae fund.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
May 04, 2015 Pankaj*
PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.05.07 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Deepak Aggarwal
Nidhi Bansal
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court