The petition in CWP No. 15767 of 2013 was disposed of as having become infructuous since the previous order dated 24.07.2013 was complied with. No legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 35 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: February 16, 2015
Gurnam Singh
3Petitioner
Versus
Sumaidh Singh Saini and ors
555Respondents
������ ����������������������������������������
Present: 5 Mr. Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Inder Pal Goyat, Addl. A.G., Punjab
�����������������������������
Learned counsel for the parties state that the order passed by this Court on 24.07.2013 in CWP No. 15767 of 2013 has been complied with, so, the present petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
16.02.2015 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) dinesh JUDGE
DINESH KUMAR 2015.02.16 05:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Gurnam Singh
Sumaidh Singh Saini and ors
Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
