Contempt petition challenging non-compliance with a prior order was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners after being granted access to inspect the record and obtain copies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to inspect record, obtain copies, and revive petition if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-23103-CII-2015 in COCP-1262-2015 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.12.2015
Bhajan Singh & others
........... Petitioners
Vs
H.S. Sidhu, Managing Director, The Punjab State Federation of Cooperative House Building Society Ltd.
........... Respondent
Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Eshjyot Walia, Advocate
for the respondent.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (oral)
This petition is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 9.2.2015 passed by this Court.
After notice, the respondent has filed reply and has given certain details vide Annexures 'A', 'B' & 'C'.
Counsel for the petitioners is not satisfied with the said details.
Counsel for the respondent, however, submits that the petitioners are free to inspect the entire record available with the respondent as and when they like and can also obtain photostat copies of that record.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present Contempt petition in order to exercise the right which has been given by the
SATYAWAN 2015.12.24 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
COCP-1262-2015
-2-
respondent during the course of hearing.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
In case, the application made by the petitioners for inspection of record and for photostat copies is not entertained by the respondent, the petitioners are free to file an application for revival of this petition.
22.12.2015
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
sp
SATYAWAN 2015.12.24 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Bhajan Singh & others
H.S. Sidhu
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
