Dismissed
(O&M) Ran Singh v. Chander Singh etc.
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/270/1987
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1987 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 1987 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
RSA No.270 of 1987
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.270 of 1987 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.3.2014
Ran Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
Chander Singh through (LRs) and others ......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J
When this case was taken up for hearing on 20.3.2013, following
order was passed :-
Respondent nos.1 and 3 are reportedly dead. Steps be taken to implead legal heirs of respondents no.1 and 3.
Issue notice to other respondents returnable for 2.5.2013.”
Thereafter, the case was taken up for hearing on 2.5.2013 and on
the request made by learned counsel for the appellants, the case was adjourned to 30.8.2013 by passing the following order :-
“ Learned proxy counsel for the appellant seeks time to
file an application to implead the legal representatives of respondents no.1 and 3.
Per office report, notice could not be issued to respondents no.2, 5, 5(a) and 10 for want of correct
Sahni Greesh 2014.03.20 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
2
RSA No.270 of 1987
addresses. Notice has been served upon respondents no.4 and 6 to 9 but they have not appeared either in person or through an advocate to contest the prayer made in the appeal.
Fresh notice be issued to respondents no.2, 5, 5(a) and 10 for 30.8.2013.”
On 30.8.2013, none appeared for the appellant and the case was
adjourned for today by passing the following order :-
“ Notice could not be issued to respondents no.2, 5, 5(a)
and 10 for want of correct addresses.
Fresh notice be issued to respondents no.2, 5, 5(a) and 10 for 19.3.2014 on filing of their correct addresses.
Counsel for the appellant be notified about the date
fixed.”
Learned counsel for the appellant, at the very outset, fairly states that despite making his best possible efforts, he is not in a position to get any instructions. He further submits that the parties might have amicably settled the dispute, because of which nobody is turning up. Thus, he pleads no instructions.
In view of the above, the instant appeal is ordered to be dismissed
for non-prosecution.
19.3.2014 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE
Sahni Greesh 2014.03.20 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Ran Singh
Chander Singh through (LRs) and others
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court