The appellant appeared with counsel who stated instructions to withdraw the appeal. The court recorded the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.2259 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:05.08.2014
Surinder Kumar
....Appellant
Versus
Dara Chand and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- Mr. G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Lather, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for respondent No.1.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
At the outset, counsel for the appellant states that he has
instruction to withdraw the instant appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
August 05, 2014
savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2014.08.07 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Surinder Kumar
Dara Chand
RAKESH KUMAR GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
