The appeal was dismissed in default. No substantive decision, reasoning, or legal proposition was recorded in this judgment, which contains only a brief oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.6939 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:22.07.2014
Virender Kumar
....Appellant
Versus
Gobind and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- None for the appellant.
Mr. R.C.Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
Dismissed in default.
July 22, 2014 savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.07.23 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Virender Kumar
Gobind and others
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
