The appellant sought permission to withdraw a matrimonial appeal as the parties had amicably settled their disputes and the decree of divorce was converted to a mutual consent divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court granted permission to withdraw the appeal.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FAO No. 5130 of 2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 5130 of 2013 DATE OF DECISION : August 05, 2014
Amit Chadha
...Appellant
Versus
Vishu Bhardwaj
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH
Present :- Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Amrit Lal Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit referring to the decision in the collateral proceedings before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 1618 of 2014 dated 30.7.2014 that all the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled in the Mediation Centre attached to the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decree of divorce passed by the Family Court on 7.9.2013 was converted as a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, PARVINDER SINGH 2014.08.06 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
FAO No. 5130 of 2013
2
therefore, they seek permission to withdraw the appeal as infructuous.
Permission is granted. The appeal is dismissed as
infructuous.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
(NAVITA SINGH) JUDGE
August 05, 2014
p.singh
PARVINDER SINGH 2014.08.06 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Amit Chadha
Vishu Bhardwaj
M. Jeyapaul
Navita Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
