The High Court dismissed a First Appeal under default of appearance and non-prosecution. The original papers had been destroyed in a fire, but the cause list provided counsel names for both sides, with no response at hearing.
First Appeal dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
FAO No.40 of 1991
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.40 of 1991 Date of Decision.12.03.2014
Neena
......Appellant
Versus
Baldev Singh and others
......Respondents
Present: None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
responded.
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.03.18 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
-2-
FAO No.40 of 1991
whose name appear in the cause list.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
March 12, 2014
Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.03.18 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Neena
Baldev Singh
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
