This order dispenses in default without substantive reasoning or operative details other than the dismissal status.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
��������������������
Date of decision: 18th July, 2014
Manjit Dehal and others
� Appellants
Versus
Lehri Ram and others
� Respondents
������������� ��������!�������"�!��"����������
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Dinesh K. Parjapati, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Madan, Advocate for respondent No.3.
��"�!��"���������#����$��� %
Dismissed in default.
$��"�!��"���������%�
������
�&'(���#����)�
���
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2014.07.30 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Manjit Dehal and others
Lehri Ram and others
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
