An appeal was dismissed for default due to the appellants' failure to appear for hearing and prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.3100 of 2002 Date of Decision.18.07.2014
Sameer Dixit and others
......Appellants
Versus
Krishan Kumar and others
......Respondents
Present: None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
given. There is no representation for the appellants at the time when
the matter is called.
prosecution.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
July 18, 2014 Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.07.23 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sameer Dixit and others
Krishan Kumar and others
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
