The Court dismissed the appellant's appeal for default as the counsel reported no instructions were received from the appellant.
The appeal was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 31-M of 2004 DATE OF DECISION : September 04, 2014
Ravinder Kaur
...Appellant
Versus
Gurmit Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH
Present :- Ms. Malkiat Mann, Advocate for the appellant.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reports
no instructions from the appellant.
The appeal stands dismissed for default.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
(NAVITA SINGH) JUDGE
September 04, 2014
p.singh
PARVINDER SINGH 2014.09.08 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
RAVINDER KAUR
GURMIT SINGH
M. JEYAPAUL
NAVITA SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
