The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the appellants' counsel submitted that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and the respondent had no objection to the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of appeal; Dismissal of appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO 271 of 1995 Date of Decision: August 26, 2014
Smt.Guro & Ors.
...Appellants
Versus
Sh.Raj Kumar & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.S.D.Bansal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.Rahul Pathania, Advocate, for Mr.R.C.Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties to this appeal have amicably sorted out their disputes and effected compromise, therefore, the appellants do not intend to continue with the appeal. He prays for withdrawal of the same.
Learned counsel for respondent No.5 has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellants.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
August 26, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2014.08.26 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Smt.Guro & Ors.
Sh.Raj Kumar & Ors.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
