examined but he was not able to vouch for the registration number of the vehicle which could have given a sure indication of the identity of the vehicle. This assumes significance because the owner and driver of the vehicle which was said to have been involved whose registration number had been incorporated subsequently denied the accident. The owner was also examined before the Tribunal to say that his vehicle had never been involved in the accident. The Tribunal reasoned that the persons who were said to be witnesses were not examined and the only person who was examined was also not prepared to give a sure identity of the vehicle with reference to the registration number. With so many fallibilities attendant in the claimants' contention, if the Tribunal had dismissed it, I will find no reason to modify the judgment for consideration of the claim in their favour.