The High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the driver and owner of a vehicle against an insurance claim award, accepting the Tribunal's reasoning that the vehicle was involved in the fatal accident.
The appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
FAO No.2309 of 1994
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.2309 of 1994 Date of Decision. 11.03.2014
Dharam Singh and others
......Appellants
Versus
Sushma Sharma and others .....Respondents
Present: Mr. J.S. Toor, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Imtiaz Ali, Advocate for the respondents.
Mr. P.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.03.12 13:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
-2-
FAO No.2309 of 1994
untruthful conduct.
Tribunal, I have no reason to vary or modify the award.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
March 11, 2014 Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.03.12 13:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Dharam Singh and others
Sushma Sharma and others
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
