Single-judge oral order allowing insurance appeal by awarding extra 50,000/- with interest based on party mutual agreement, modifying the tribunal award.
Award of 50,000/- with 6% per annum interest on the basis of mutual agreement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.1694 of 1994 Date of Decision. 28.03.2014
Jai Kumar
......Appellant
Versus
Sh. Jagdish and others
......Respondents
Present: Mr. Gaurav S. Rana, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Gopal Mittal, Advocate for the insurance company.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
50,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum in full quit to all claims against
the insurer. This is on the basis of mutual agreement between the parties.
appeal is allowed to the above extent.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
March 28, 2014 Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.04.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Jai Kumar
Sh. Jagdish and others
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
