The single judge dismissed an appeal filed by an appellant in a case involving an Insurance Company. The appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution as no representation was placed on behalf of the appellant.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.1516 of 1996 Date of decision:09.07.2014
Smt. Pushpa Rani
....Appellant
Versus
Dilbagh Singh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- None for the appellant.
Mr. Mukesh K.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
It is not in dispute that the appeal filed on behalf of the Insurance Company challenging the impugned award has been dismissed against the claimants.
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
A copy of this order be sent to the appellant through
registered post at the address given in the memo of parties.
July 09, 2014 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.07.10 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Smt. Pushpa Rani
Dilbagh Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
