Ram Bharosa Goel v. Haryana Tourism Corpn.L
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9185 of 2002 Date of Decision. 18.12.2014
Sh. Ram Bhrosa Goel son of Sh. Sant Ram Dhawan .......Petitioner
Versus
Haryana Tourism Corporation through its Managing Director and others ......Respondents
Present: Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Roopak Bansal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. C.S. Singh, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Hooda, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
- Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Bhrosa Goel
- respondent
Haryana Tourism Corporation
Coram
K. KANNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/9185/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court