This court dismissed three writ petitions filed against the Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur, by default due to the absence of the petitioners and lack of prosecution. Costs were imposed.
All three writ petitions are dismissed with costs of Rs. 10,000/- in each to be paid to the Legal Services Authority, Punjab.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
C.W.P No.8629 of 1992
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P No.8629 of 1992 Date of Decision.22.05.2014
Raj Enterprises through Shri Satish Khanna .......Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur and another ......Respondents
Inderjit son of Shri Baldev Raj .......Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur and another ......Respondents
M/s Raj Enterprises through Shri Satish Khanna and another
.......Petitioners
Versus
Executive Officer, Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur and another
......Respondents
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. P.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
appearance and non prosecution with costs of ` 10,000/- in each writ
petition to be paid to the Legal Services Authority, Punjab. No
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.05.27 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
C.W.P No.8629 of 1992
-2-
application for restoration shall be entertained unless proof of payment
of costs is shown.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
May 22, 2014 Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.05.27 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Raj Enterprises through Shri Satish Khanna
Inderjit son of Shri Baldev Raj
M/s Raj Enterprises through Shri Satish Khanna
Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur
Executive Officer, Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
