The High Court disposed of the present writ petition by relying on its earlier decision in CW P No.19828 of 1996, finding the issue covered without further examination, in the absence of the petitioner appearing on paper.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.8613 of 1996 (O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 04.02.2014
Jaswant Singh Raz
…..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI
Present: None for the petitioner
Mr. Harsimran S. Sethi, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE : (Oral)
The registry has put up this matter in view of the fact that the issue raised in the present petition is covered by the decision of this
Court in CW P No.19828 of 1996 titled as Surinder Singh vs. State
of Punjab and others, decided on 30.05.1997 .
The present petition is, thus, disposed of in terms of the said
judgment.
( SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL ) CHI EF JUSTI CE 04.02.2014 ( ARUN PALLI ) parkash* JUDGE
Chand Parkash 2014.02.04 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Surinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and othersReferred¶13
CW P No.19828 of 1996 Surinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 30.05.1997
Jaswant Singh Raz
State of Punjab
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
